Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Books you never read: Chronicles of an Age of Darkness
Chronicles of an Age of Darkness was 10 book series that is fairly unusual in that it made it to 10 books without the author dying or having an editor dick around with the format. I see that Wikipedia says it was meant to be a 20 book series, but at 10 books, it felt complete.
I can see why it never took off - if I hadn't been working in a bookstore and consuming every generic fantasy product of the day, I probably wouldn't have picked up the second book. The first book - The Wizards and the Warriors was good, but not spectacular. It had your standard Fantasy Adventurer Protagonists and a quest to save the world, etc. It did have a certain gritty style about it that I liked, but aside from that it was nothing special.
The second book, The Wordsmiths and the Warguild, was hilarious. The opening passage describing Sung had me laughing hysterically, and the characters had changed from standard swordsmen and wizards to gormless idiots flailing around trying somehow to survive. It was a complete surprise, and I'll bet a lot of people who read the Wizards never went on to Wordsmiths.
And then I hated The Women and the Warlords. I can't really remember what it was about now, or why I disliked it - I've been meaning to give it another try now that I'm older. The memory of Wordsmiths stayed with me though, and I bought The Walrus and the Warwolf (Have you noticed the style of the titles yet?) Walrus was much like the first book, allright but nothing like the Wordsmiths.
I kept with the series despite its spotty nature. It seemed like each new book was probably going to be allright, maybe really bad, maybe really good. I liked those odds. With the next two books, The Wicked and the Witless and The Wishstone and the Wonderworkers I lucked out. Even funnier than Wordsmiths! Hints at forgotten technology! Death, mayhem and excitement! They were so great. But who was going to read them?
The rest of the series never managed to hit the heights of those two books, at least as far as I was concerned. But he never hit any lows either. Each book, with a few exceptions, had completely different characters, but the story seemed somehow to lurch along each individual story somehow connecting into a greater narrative. With the final book telling the story of Guest Gulkan, a background character in every book so far, you had a sense that at last this anarchic storyline was going to conclude. And so it did, not with a bang or a whimper, but somewhere in between.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Adding to the cloud.
Cade Metz's piece: Google Chrome OS - do we want another monoculture? isn't so bad, if you ignore the headline. He doesn't talk in the article about how Google Chrome will take over the world so I have to assume the headline was added by someone else.
The problem I do find with the article is that in his quest to come off all cynical and negative about his subject, he makes a few crazy statements.
But the ultimate irony is that after years of criticizing Microsoft for bundling its OS with its browser, Google has nearly made them one and the same.
Wait, what? Is Metz confusing Google with Netscape here? I'm sure Google hasn't had anything complementary to say about MS's browser bundling. But most of what I remember Google saying about IE, is that its a really crap browser, and that they had to write Chrome to save us all from it.
The realisation that anything you want to do, you can do in a browser isn't all that new either. Mozilla's been threatening to do it for years - its about time someone really tried it.
Then he takes this:
"We're going to be working with our key partners very hard to make sure you see lightly larger netbooks, essentially netbooks that can accommodate a full-sized keyboard and a much more comfortable touchpad. We care about the displays. We care about the resolutions people get on these displays. And those will all be part of the specified reference hardware."
and identifies it as Apple-like. Bashing Apple is one of the Registers favourite things (after bashing MS). But really, does Apple provide reference hardware? No. That's Microsoft. Apple makes their own hardware, and sues manufactures who try an run OS X on PC hardware.
Then, Metz misunderstands, or deliberately fudges over the nature of open source:
And, yes, the ban extends to third-party browsers. Chrome OS is limited to Chrome. Naturally. The only way to run the OS with a third-party browser, Pichai said, is to grab the open source code and do your own surgery.
Well yes. Of course, the ability to do your own surgery is what open source is all about. And once you've done it, you can make it available to others who don't want to do surgery. Similarly the fact that Chrome OS does not support current hardware is something that can be quickly corrected - if enough people like the OS.
Lastly, there's a difference between how MS pushes its applications on to you and how Google does. MS makes you buy an operating system by being the only one. Then it gives its own applications a head start with private APIs. Then it makes sure that only its applications can read documents created with other MS applications. Or at least that's how it used to work.
Google makes you use its applications by having them be the best, and free. It uses open standards so you don't get locked in. It doesn't have to lock you in - as long as its applications are the best and free, then they have you. The only question is "Is this application the best one?" if the answer is yes, for you, then Google has you.
As long as Google's dominance is dependant on them releasing software that people like, for free, we don't have anything to worry about.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Smartest thing I've read today.
Shirky: Ontology is Overrated -- Categories, Links, and Tags: "Clay Shirky's Writings About the Internet
Economics & Culture, Media & Community
Today I want to talk about categorization, and I want to convince you that a lot of what we think we know about categorization is wrong. In particular, I want to convince you that many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the electronic world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies.
Monday, November 9, 2009
Campaign Log: End of Winter
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
45 Master Characters
The first question that comes to mind is "Is it correct?" Has she correctly classified all the myriad personalities of the world into 45 types? I don't believe that she has. Or that it can be done - I think that humans have a tendency to classify things, and to then see the world in terms of those classifications. The real world is woolier than that, and when you look closely at any classification system you see flaws. Take our species classification system - different species aren't supposed to be able to mate, but we have mules, and ligors.
Even the most basic classification - the 0s and 1s of digital computers - breaks down when you look at it closely. Zero turns out to be 0 to 0.5, and occasionally something that should be a zero shows up as a 0.51 and you get an error.
Despite this computers still manage to work most of the time. Correct isn't as important as useful. So is the book useful? I think so. I'm finding that the artificial constraint of the archetypes is giving my characters more life than they would otherwise have. And the structure of the journey that it talks about is giving me something to do with them - even when I disagree with the structure.
So thus far, it seems worth the price. If I become a world famous author, I'll be sure to mention it as an influence.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Campaign Log: Winter 1470 (3) (updated)
-- Update --
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Ah, Politics
Monday, October 12, 2009
Campaign Log: Winter 1470 (2)
- Nobody to get killed.
- His trees not to get cut down.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Why does Gartner exist?
Prediction:
Speaking of Apple, its share of the smartphone OS market will also grow - but only from 10.8 per cent to 13.7 per cent [in 2012], Gartner said.Observation:
The latest smart-phone numbers from Canalys show that Apple's gaining share like a bat out of hell. The company has gone from 2% global share to 14% share in a year.Looks like Gartner's numbers are a little out of date? I can't understand why newspapers keep quoting Gartner reports like they mean something - and why managers keep reading their reports. They are just so often wrong.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
I'm starting to remember what I like about my job
The good thing about working in a soul-sucking bureaucracy is... you can't fail. You can stuff something up, but thats not failure. Clearly, you didn't have the knowledge or experience or enough time or whatever to complete the task. We'll work out what went wrong and do better next time. And thats when you stuff up, which is rare, because a bureaucracy has rules to follow. As long as you follow the rules, you'll do well. If you find yourself in a situation without rules, you can do whatever you want - and if it doesn't work out, then there will be some new rules to cover that situation.
In the real world, failure hurts. Even if its just the rejection of a story submission to a magazine, when you put yourself out there its you that gets rejected. That never happens in my job - I can do my job in my sleep.
Which brings us to the bad part. Doing my job - I am asleep. Theres just mindless tedium and endless procedure, and I hate it. Its easy, but you can't live fully when doing it. Part of you has to go away and do something interesting.
Right now, I'm looking at my first piece of pain, my first rejection, and I'm thinking - I'm not good enough. I'm not writing enough, I'm not submitting enough, I'm not getting better fast enough. I'm not going to accomplish anything during this time off and I'm going to go back to work, back to sleep, with nothing having changed. Its fear and I hate it. But at least its real.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Books you've never read: The True Game
Monday, September 28, 2009
Campaign Log: Winter 1470
Friday, September 25, 2009
What a random link gets you
So in the early days of capitalism when most economically successful countries happened to be Protestant Christian, many people argued that Protestantism was uniquely suited to economic development. When Catholic France, Italy, Austria, and Southern Germany developed rapidly, particularly after the Second World War, Christianity, rather than Protestantism, became the magic culture. Until Japan became rich, many people thought East Asia had not develop because of Confucianism. But when Japan succeeded, this thesis was revised to say that Japan was developing so fast because its unique form of Confucianism emphasised cooperation over individual edification, which the Chinese and Korean versions allegedly valued more highly. And then Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and Korea also started doing well, so this judgment about the different varieties of Confucianism was forgotten. Indeed Confucianism as a whole suddenly became the best culture for development because it emphasised hard work, saving, education, and submission to authority. Today, when we now see Muslim Malaysia and Indonesia, Buddhist Thailand, and even Hindu India doing economically well, we can soon expect to encounter new theories that will trumpet how uniquely all these cultures are suited for economic development (and how their authors have known about it all along).
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Character Profile: Azaith
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Games I Play: Pendragon
Monday, September 21, 2009
Free at last
Whenever I told people that I was taking the rest of the year off, the universal response after, "Wow." and "I'm jealous." was "Where are you going to go?" It bugged me, because I didn't have a good answer. Well, I did have an answer, but staring incredulously at the person and saying "Why would I want to go anywhere?" didn't seem to be the right one.
Don't get me wrong, I think travel is great - see new places, get away from the rut at home, etc. I've done that, and I will do that more in the future. But Perth is a fantastic city to live in - clean air, open spaces, filled with greenery and with a great standard of living. I've spent years collecting books and video and other entertainment, making my home as comfortable to me as possible. All my friends, whom I regularly game with are here. Why would I want to leave this?
So if I got through that question, the next one was inevitably, "So what are you going to do?" And again I was pretty much stuck for an answer. As if there was only one, or a short list of things, that I could do in three months. The best answer I could come up with was - live. And here I'll add that I don't know what I'll be doing. I have plans, sure. But what I'm going to do, for the first time in my life, is do whatever I want most to do, without having to worry about expenses, without worrying about the time it will take, without having the excuse that work is taking all my attention.
This blog is part of that, the rest remains to be seen. Maybe I'll volunteer to work in East Timor, maybe I'll stare at the ceiling for two days straight. But whatever it is, for the rest of the year, I'll be free to do it.